MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0022219413487406

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of learning disabilities · 2013

Effects of multimedia vocabulary instruction on adolescents with learning disabilities.

Kennedy Michael J, Deshler Donald D, Lloyd John Wills

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The purpose of this experimental study is to investigate the effects of using content acquisition podcasts (CAPs), an example of instructional technology, to provide vocabulary instruction to adolescents with and without learning disabilities (LD). A total of 279 urban high school students, including 30 with LD in an area related to reading, were randomly assigned to one of four experimental conditions with instruction occurring at individual computer terminals over a 3-week period. Each of the four conditions contained different configurations of multimedia-based instruction and evidence-based vocabulary instruction. Dependent measures of vocabulary knowledge indicated that students with LD who received vocabulary instruction using CAPs through an explicit instructional methodology and the keyword mnemonic strategy significantly outperformed other students with LD who were taught using the same content, but with multimedia instruction that did not adhere to a specific theoretical design framework. Results for general education students mirrored those for students with LD. Students also completed a satisfaction measure following instruction with multimedia and expressed overall agreement that CAPs are useful for learning vocabulary terms.

Для цитирования: Kennedy Michael J, Deshler Donald D, Lloyd John Wills. Effects of multimedia vocabulary instruction on adolescents with learning disabilities.. Journal of learning disabilities. 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0022219413487406.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.