Der Radiologe · 2005
[Improvements in detection of rectal cancer recurrence by multiplanar reconstruction].
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stückle C A, Haegele K F, Jendreck M, Kickuth R, Schneider O, Hohlbach G, Liermann D
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the advantages of multiplanar reconstruction and different axial slice thickness in diagnostic of rectal cancer recurrence after operation and radiotherapy.
METHOD: We included 83 patients after operation and radiotherapy of rectal cancer in this study. All patients got a minimum of three CT-examinations in their follow-up program. A total of 294 CT-scans were evaluated. Each examination was reviewed by two experienced radiologists in respect to recurrence. Each examination was presented in axial reconstruction with a slice sickness of 8, 5, and 1.25 mm and in multiplanar reconstruction. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy were calculated.
RESULTS: Multiplanar reconstructions showed better results for the detection of recurrence than axial reconstruction. A reduced slice thickness did not lead to better results in axial reconstruction. Multiplanar reconstruction showed a sensitivity of 0.88, a specificity of 0.98, an accuracy of 0.96 and a positive predictive value of 0,94, for axial reconstruction we calculated: 0.82, 0.97, 0.94 and 0.88, respectively. Sensitivity and accuracy showed a significant increase after the first and second examination.
CONCLUSION: Multiplanar reconstructions allow a significant better detection of rectal cancer recurrence when compared to axial reconstructions. Thinner axial slice thickness shows no diagnostic advantage.
METHOD: We included 83 patients after operation and radiotherapy of rectal cancer in this study. All patients got a minimum of three CT-examinations in their follow-up program. A total of 294 CT-scans were evaluated. Each examination was reviewed by two experienced radiologists in respect to recurrence. Each examination was presented in axial reconstruction with a slice sickness of 8, 5, and 1.25 mm and in multiplanar reconstruction. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy were calculated.
RESULTS: Multiplanar reconstructions showed better results for the detection of recurrence than axial reconstruction. A reduced slice thickness did not lead to better results in axial reconstruction. Multiplanar reconstruction showed a sensitivity of 0.88, a specificity of 0.98, an accuracy of 0.96 and a positive predictive value of 0,94, for axial reconstruction we calculated: 0.82, 0.97, 0.94 and 0.88, respectively. Sensitivity and accuracy showed a significant increase after the first and second examination.
CONCLUSION: Multiplanar reconstructions allow a significant better detection of rectal cancer recurrence when compared to axial reconstructions. Thinner axial slice thickness shows no diagnostic advantage.