Journal of electrocardiology · 2020
Head-up tilt test diagnostic yield in syncope diagnosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barón-Esquivias Gonzalo, Díaz Martín Antonio J, Del Castillo Álvaro Marco, Quintanilla Macarena, Barón-Solís Carmen, Morillo Carlos A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The European Syncope Guidelines (ESG) recommend the use of Head-up tilt test (HUT) in case of suspicion of vasovagal syncope (VVS) or orthostatic hypotensive syncope (OHS) after an adequate initial inconclusive evaluation. We report a single center experience in the scenario of suspected VVS or OHS, who underwent HUT in patients referred to a Syncope Clinic after ruling out high-risk causes.
METHODS: We prospectively and consecutively included all syncopal patients that were referred for HUT, by their attending physician after performing a series of diagnostic tests to rule out cardiac etiology. The clinical history and diagnostic tests performed were reviewed prior to HUT. Patients were pre-classified according to the recommendations from the ESG as; VVS, OHS or Syncope of Unknown Etiology (SUE).
RESULTS: We studied 1058 patients, 558 (52.7%) males, mean age 46.5 ± 20.1 yr. There were no gender differences in age, risk factors, previous heart diseases, ECG findings or number of previous tests. Based on the ESG criteria a significant number of diagnostic tests were probably unnecessarily performed. HUT was positive in 609 patients (57.5%). The rate of positive HUT according to pre-classification was significantly different among groups: 60% VVS, 46.1% OHS and 54.3% SUE (p = 0.037). Combining ESG recommendations and HUT results of the 1058 resulted in 762 (72%) diagnosed as VVS, 89 (8.4%) as OHS and 207 (19.5%) as SUE.
CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate application of ESG recommendations combined with HUT, identified 81% of patients with non-cardiogenic syncope, potentially avoiding a significant number of unnecessary diagnostic tests.
METHODS: We prospectively and consecutively included all syncopal patients that were referred for HUT, by their attending physician after performing a series of diagnostic tests to rule out cardiac etiology. The clinical history and diagnostic tests performed were reviewed prior to HUT. Patients were pre-classified according to the recommendations from the ESG as; VVS, OHS or Syncope of Unknown Etiology (SUE).
RESULTS: We studied 1058 patients, 558 (52.7%) males, mean age 46.5 ± 20.1 yr. There were no gender differences in age, risk factors, previous heart diseases, ECG findings or number of previous tests. Based on the ESG criteria a significant number of diagnostic tests were probably unnecessarily performed. HUT was positive in 609 patients (57.5%). The rate of positive HUT according to pre-classification was significantly different among groups: 60% VVS, 46.1% OHS and 54.3% SUE (p = 0.037). Combining ESG recommendations and HUT results of the 1058 resulted in 762 (72%) diagnosed as VVS, 89 (8.4%) as OHS and 207 (19.5%) as SUE.
CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate application of ESG recommendations combined with HUT, identified 81% of patients with non-cardiogenic syncope, potentially avoiding a significant number of unnecessary diagnostic tests.