MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.21037/jtd-21-1196

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of thoracic disease · 2021

Ambulant treatment with a digital chest tube for prolonged air leak is safe and effective.

Dinjens Lars, de Boer Wytze S, Stigt Jos A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Outpatient or ambulatory treatment for prolonged air leak (PAL) has been reported previously in various studies. Evidence regarding efficiency and safety is nevertheless poor. This report describes the experience of 10 years ambulatory care with a digital chest drain system monitored by specialized nurses in our centre. The aim of the study is to give further insights in the effectiveness and safety of this treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective data of 10 years ambulatory care for PAL were examined. One hundred and forty patients with PAL after pneumothorax or pulmonary surgery were included.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients with PAL were included. Treatment was successful in 112 patients (80.0%). Hospital readmission was necessary in 33 patients (23.6%) and 28 (20.0%) of them received additional treatment. Additional treatment consisted of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in 19 patients (13.6%), new chest tube placement in 8 patients (5.7%) and pleurodesis (with talc slurry) in 1 patient (0.7%). Minor complications occurred in 10 patients (7.1%), major complications requiring readmission occurred in 14 patients (10.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulatory treatment of PAL with a digital monitoring device resulted in a high success rate with a limited complication rate.

Для цитирования: Dinjens Lars, de Boer Wytze S, Stigt Jos A. Ambulant treatment with a digital chest tube for prolonged air leak is safe and effective.. Journal of thoracic disease. 2021. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-1196.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.