The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc · 1996
Initial treatment of microbial keratitis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Blanton C L, Rapuano C J, Cohen E J, Laibson P R
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The common occurrence of failed medical treatment in microbial keratitis led us to investigate this phenomenon.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all ulcers that presented to our department for 24 consecutive months. We classified each ulcer as either a therapeutic success or failure based on a precise definition of the response to initial antibiotic selection. We then analyzed multiple factors including: antibiotic selection, ophthalmic disease, ulcer characteristics, and management, to determine their significance in the success or failure in treating microbial keratitis. Complications were also examined.
RESULTS: Important factors in failure were non-fortified antibiotics (P < 0.001), ocular surface disease (P = 0.0178) and outpatient management (P < 0.001). Large ulcers (P = 0.051) were of borderline significance. Sensitivity results reflect high sensitivity among successfully treated patients when appropriate antibiotics are chosen.
CONCLUSIONS: This report provides insight into current practice patterns and potential means to improve success in managing microbial keratitis.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all ulcers that presented to our department for 24 consecutive months. We classified each ulcer as either a therapeutic success or failure based on a precise definition of the response to initial antibiotic selection. We then analyzed multiple factors including: antibiotic selection, ophthalmic disease, ulcer characteristics, and management, to determine their significance in the success or failure in treating microbial keratitis. Complications were also examined.
RESULTS: Important factors in failure were non-fortified antibiotics (P < 0.001), ocular surface disease (P = 0.0178) and outpatient management (P < 0.001). Large ulcers (P = 0.051) were of borderline significance. Sensitivity results reflect high sensitivity among successfully treated patients when appropriate antibiotics are chosen.
CONCLUSIONS: This report provides insight into current practice patterns and potential means to improve success in managing microbial keratitis.