MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archsurg.140.5.450

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) · 2005

Critical appraisal of the clinical and pathologic predictors of survival after resection of large hepatocellular carcinoma.

Pawlik Timothy M, Poon Ronnie T, Abdalla Eddie K, Zorzi Daria, Ikai Iwao, Curley Steven A, Nagorney David M, Belghiti Jacques, Ng Irene Oi-Lin, Yamaoka Yoshio, Lauwers Gregory Y, Vauthey Jean-Nicolas, International Cooperative Study Group on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

HYPOTHESIS: A subset of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a diameter of 10 cm or larger may benefit from hepatic resection.

DESIGN

Retrospective study of a multi-institutional database.

SETTING

Five major hepatobiliary centers.

PATIENTS: We identified 300 patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC 10 cm or larger.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and pathologic data were collected, and prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Patient survival was stratified according to a clinical scoring system and pathologic T classification.

RESULTS

The perioperative mortality rate was 5%. At a median follow-up of 32 months, the median survival was 20.3 months, and the 5-year actuarial survival rate was 27%. Four clinical factors-alpha-fetoprotein of 1000 ng/mL or higher, multiple tumor nodules, the presence of major vascular invasion, and the presence of severe fibrosis-were significant predictors of poor survival (all P<.05). Patients were assigned a clinical score according to the following risk factors: 1, no factor; 2, one or two factors; or 3, three or four factors. On the basis of the clinical score, patients could be stratified into only 2 distinct prognostic groups: no factor (score of 1) vs 1 or more factors (score of 2 or 3) (P<.001). In contrast, when patients were stratified according to pathologic T classification, 3 distinct groups were identified: T1 vs T2 vs T3 and T4 combined (P<.001). Fifty-six percent of the patients with a clinical score of 2 and 20% of patients with a clinical score of 3 actually had T1 or T2 disease on pathologic examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with large HCCs should be considered for liver resection as this treatment is associated with a 5-year survival rate exceeding 25%. Clinical predictors should not be used to exclude patients from surgical resection because these factors do not reliably predict outcome.

Для цитирования: Pawlik Timothy M, Poon Ronnie T, Abdalla Eddie K, Zorzi Daria, Ikai Iwao, Curley Steven A, Nagorney David M, Belghiti Jacques, Ng Irene Oi-Lin, Yamaoka Yoshio, Lauwers Gregory Y, Vauthey Jean-Nicolas, International Cooperative Study Group on Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Critical appraisal of the clinical and pathologic predictors of survival after resection of large hepatocellular carcinoma.. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 2005. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.140.5.450.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.