Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2019
Functional surgery versus amputation for in situ or minimally invasive nail melanoma: A meta-analysis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jo Gwanghyun, Cho Soo Ick, Choi Sungjun, Mun Je-Ho
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Evidence on whether functional surgery is not inferior to amputation for the treatment of in situ or minimally invasive (Breslow thickness ≤0.5 mm) nail melanoma is limited.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the difference in local recurrence between the 2 interventions for in situ or minimally invasive nail melanoma using available published studies.
METHODS: We performed systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, trial registers, and grey literature databases from inception to June 28, 2018. We included observational studies with at least 5 patients with in situ or minimally invasive nail melanoma. Main outcome was local recurrence.
RESULTS: The odds ratio synthesized from 5 studies including 109 patients (88 functional operations and 21 amputations) was 1.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.31-8.00).
LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and possible interstudy heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis revealed no difference in local recurrence between the 2 interventions. Considering the functional deficit after amputation, conservative surgery should be the treatment of choice for in situ or minimally invasive nail melanoma.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the difference in local recurrence between the 2 interventions for in situ or minimally invasive nail melanoma using available published studies.
METHODS: We performed systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, trial registers, and grey literature databases from inception to June 28, 2018. We included observational studies with at least 5 patients with in situ or minimally invasive nail melanoma. Main outcome was local recurrence.
RESULTS: The odds ratio synthesized from 5 studies including 109 patients (88 functional operations and 21 amputations) was 1.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.31-8.00).
LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and possible interstudy heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis revealed no difference in local recurrence between the 2 interventions. Considering the functional deficit after amputation, conservative surgery should be the treatment of choice for in situ or minimally invasive nail melanoma.