Journal of clinical psychology · 1983
Improvement in clients who have given different reasons for dropping out of treatment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pekarik G
Аннотация
Addressed the dropout problem by (a) directly asking clients their reasons for dropping out; and (b) assessing pretherapy to follow-up symptom change in clients grouped by dropout reason. Forty-six dropouts who had been administered the Brief Symptom Inventory at intake were contacted 3 months later. At follow-up they were asked their reasons for dropping out and readministered the Brief Symptom Inventory. It was found that 39% quit due to "no need for services," 35% due to "environmental constraints," and 26% due to "dislike of services." The "no need for services" and "environmental constraints" groups had significant decreases in intake to follow-up Brief Symptom Inventory scores. Dropouts were found to be a heterogeneous group whose follow-up adjustment was related to termination reason. This contradicts prevailing notions that consider all dropouts as treatment failures.