Magnetic resonance imaging · 2024
Flow independent black blood imaging with a large FOV from the neck to the aortic arch: A feasibility study at 3 tesla.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tachikawa Yoshihiko, Maki Yasunori, Ikeda Kento, Yoshikai Hikaru, Toyonari Nobuyuki, Hamano Hiroshi, Chiwata Naoya, Suzuyama Kenji, Takahashi Yukihiko
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of obtaining black-blood imaging with a large FOV from the neck to the aortic arch at 3 T using a newly modified Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering for Black-Blood Imaging (REACT-BB).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: REACT-BB provides black-blood images by adjusting the inversion time (TI) in REACT to the null point of blood. The optimal TI for REACT-BB was investigated in 10 healthy volunteers with TI varied from 200 ms to 1400 ms. Contrast ratios were calculated between muscle and three branch arteries of the aortic arch. Additionally, a comparison between REACT-BB and MPRAGE involved evaluating the depiction of high-intensity plaques in 222 patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack. Measurements included plaque-to-muscle signal intensity ratios (PMR), plaque volumes, and carotid artery stenosis rates in 60 patients with high-intensity plaques in carotid arteries.
RESULTS: REACT-BB with TI = 850 ms produced the black-blood image with the best contrast between blood and background tissues. REACT-BB outperformed MPRAGE in depicting high-intensity plaques in the aortic arch (55.4% vs 45.5%) and exhibited superior overall image quality in visual assessment (3.31 ± 0.70 vs 2.89 ± 0.73; p < 0.05). Although the PMR of REACT-BB was significantly lower than MPRAGE (2.227 ± 0.601 vs 2.285 ± 0.662; P < 0.05), a strong positive correlation existed between REACT-BB and MPRAGE (ρ = 0.935; P < 0.05), and all high-intensity plaques that MPRAGE detected were clearly detected by REACT-BB.
CONCLUSION: REACT-BB provides black-blood images with uniformly suppressed fat and blood signals over a large FOV from the neck to the aortic arch with comparable or better high-signal plaque depiction than MPRAGE.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: REACT-BB provides black-blood images by adjusting the inversion time (TI) in REACT to the null point of blood. The optimal TI for REACT-BB was investigated in 10 healthy volunteers with TI varied from 200 ms to 1400 ms. Contrast ratios were calculated between muscle and three branch arteries of the aortic arch. Additionally, a comparison between REACT-BB and MPRAGE involved evaluating the depiction of high-intensity plaques in 222 patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack. Measurements included plaque-to-muscle signal intensity ratios (PMR), plaque volumes, and carotid artery stenosis rates in 60 patients with high-intensity plaques in carotid arteries.
RESULTS: REACT-BB with TI = 850 ms produced the black-blood image with the best contrast between blood and background tissues. REACT-BB outperformed MPRAGE in depicting high-intensity plaques in the aortic arch (55.4% vs 45.5%) and exhibited superior overall image quality in visual assessment (3.31 ± 0.70 vs 2.89 ± 0.73; p < 0.05). Although the PMR of REACT-BB was significantly lower than MPRAGE (2.227 ± 0.601 vs 2.285 ± 0.662; P < 0.05), a strong positive correlation existed between REACT-BB and MPRAGE (ρ = 0.935; P < 0.05), and all high-intensity plaques that MPRAGE detected were clearly detected by REACT-BB.
CONCLUSION: REACT-BB provides black-blood images with uniformly suppressed fat and blood signals over a large FOV from the neck to the aortic arch with comparable or better high-signal plaque depiction than MPRAGE.