MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ensci.2015.09.004

Медицинская библиотека · eNeurologicalSci · 2015

Retinal nerve fiber layer sector-specific compromise in relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis.

Loughran-Fjeldstad Anette S, Carlson Noel G, Husebye Cassandra D, Cook Lawrence J, Rose John W

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate quadrant and sector retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and total macular volume (TMV) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS) patients.

METHODS

Optical coherence tomography measures of RNFL and TMV were studied in 321 eyes without prior optic neuritis (ON) (MS unaffected), 151 eyes with prior ON (MS affected), and 148 healthy control eyes.

RESULTS

Mean RNFL thickness was significantly lower in the MS affected and MS unaffected groups relative to the control group (p < 0.0001). RNFL thicknesses in the superior, inferior, and temporal quadrants were significantly reduced in MS unaffected (113 ± 15 μm, 119 ± 17 μm, 63 ± 13 μm) (p < 0.001) and MS affected groups (99 ± 19 μm, 103 ± 21 μm, 51 ± 13 μm) (p < 0.0001) compared with that in controls (120 ± 14 μm, 128 ± 15 μm, 69 ± 8 μm, respectively). TMV was significantly reduced in both the MS affected and MS unaffected groups compared with that in the controls (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Quadrant, sector, and PMB RNFL thicknesses are significant individual measures in RR-MS for both affected and unaffected eyes and may prove valuable in future investigations including biomarker and outcomes research.

Для цитирования: Loughran-Fjeldstad Anette S, Carlson Noel G, Husebye Cassandra D, Cook Lawrence J, Rose John W. Retinal nerve fiber layer sector-specific compromise in relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis.. eNeurologicalSci. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ensci.2015.09.004.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.