MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000346998

Медицинская библиотека · Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2013

Rapid on-site evaluation improves needle aspiration sensitivity in the diagnosis of central lung cancers: a randomized trial.

Mondoni Michele, Carlucci Paolo, Di Marco Fabiano, Rossi Stefania, Santus Pierachille, D'Adda Alice, Sferrazza Papa Giuseppe Francesco, Bulfamante Gaetano, Centanni Stefano

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Few prospective studies have evaluated the role of endobronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing central airways neoplasms. Rapid on-site evaluation has long been used in transbronchial needle aspiration of adenopathies and peripheral lesions, but its role in sampling central malignancies has not been substantiated yet.

OBJECTIVES

In this study we evaluated if endobronchial needle aspiration may increase the sensitivity of bronchoscopy for diagnosing central airways neoplasms when added to conventional diagnostic methods (forceps biopsy, brushing and bronchial washing), and if rapid on-site evaluation may be beneficial in patients undergoing endobronchial needle aspiration.

METHODS

125 patients (77% males, aged 70 ± 7 years; mean ± SD) with central lung cancers were randomized to undergo bronchoscopy including conventional diagnostic methods and needle aspiration, with or without rapid on-site evaluation, stratifying the patients on the basis of the neoplasm growth pattern (exophytic and submucosal/peribronchial disease).

RESULTS

Needle aspiration significantly increased the sensitivity of bronchoscopy when added to conventional methods (from 76 to 91%; p < 0.001), primarily resulting from differences in submucosal/peribronchial diseases (68 vs. 90%; p < 0.001) and independently from the presence of rapid on-site evaluation; needle aspiration guided by rapid on-site evaluation guaranteed a higher improvement in bronchoscopy sensitivity than conventional needle aspiration (98 vs. 84%, respectively; p = 0.004). Needle aspiration guided by rapid on-site evaluation showed a significantly higher sensitivity than the conventional method (97 vs. 76%, respectively; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Needle aspiration increases the sensitivity of bronchoscopy in diagnosing central airways malignancies when added to conventional diagnostic methods, with a further significant improvement when guided by rapid on-site evaluation.

Для цитирования: Mondoni Michele, Carlucci Paolo, Di Marco Fabiano, Rossi Stefania, Santus Pierachille, D'Adda Alice, Sferrazza Papa Giuseppe Francesco, Bulfamante Gaetano, Centanni Stefano. Rapid on-site evaluation improves needle aspiration sensitivity in the diagnosis of central lung cancers: a randomized trial.. Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases. 2013. DOI: 10.1159/000346998.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.