DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106491
Clinical and radiological outcomes in relation with the anatomical orientation of clipped middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The middle cerebral artery (MCA) bifurcation represents the most frequent location for intracranial aneurysms. Often, the aneurysmal dome can hide the origin of perforating arteries from the M1 segment during the surgical clipping causing ischemic lesions and worse clinical outcome. The aim of this paper is to analyze the association between the orientation of the aneurysm sac and the clinical and radiological outcomes after surgical clipping.
METHODS
Data from 50 MCA bifurcation clipped aneurysms in 47 patients were collected retrospectively. Three different groups were identified according to the aneurysmal sac orientation: anterior-inferior, posterior and superior. A possible association between the aneurysmal sac projection and the outcome was searched through a univariable logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS
Statistical analysis showed significant correlation between the radiologic evidence of post-operative ischemia in the posterior group (p = 0.046, RR = 1.65) and an increased risk in the superior orientation group (p = 0.145, RR = 1.38). The anterior-inferior group was, instead, significantly associated with no evidence of radiologic ischemia (p = 0.0019, RR = 0.58).
CONCLUSION
The orientation of the aneurysmal dome and sac represents a fundamental feature to be considered during the surgical clipping of the MCA aneurysms. Indeed, its posterior and superior projection is associated with a higher incidence of radiologic ischemic lesions due to the origin of perforating arteries from M1 segment behind the aneurysmal sac. The anterior-inferior orientation, on the contrary, is associated with a lower risk.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.