Mid- to long-term results of SuPerLap single-port treatment in inguinal hernia.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
Laparoscopic treatment of inguinal hernia is gaining popularity in many hospitals, but the use of working channel scopes is not as widely extended. We present our long-term experience with the SuPerLap (laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous suture) technique described by Rosell et al.(1) for epigastric hernia repair in the percutaneous, single-port treatment of inguinal hernia using working channel scopes.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of a series of male patients with congenital inguinal hernia undergoing surgery from February 2017 to December 2020 was carried out. A 5 mm-0º pleuroscope with a 3.5 mm working channel, a 20 G epidural needle, a 36 cm/3.5 mm laparoscopic Maryland dissector, and 3-0 polypropylene and polyester sutures were used.
RESULTS
384 inguinal hernia repairs using the SuPerLap technique were performed in 295 male patients - 206 unilateral repairs and 89 bilateral repairs. In 24 bilateral cases (26.95%), preoperative diagnosis had been unilateral. Mean age was two years (2 weeks-13 years). Mean operating time was 14 minutes (6-50 min) for unilateral repair, and 27 minutes (14-80 min) for bilateral repair. There were two cases of epigastric vessel damage, and one case of early recurrence in a newborn, who successfully underwent re-intervention using the SuPerLap technique. No late complications were recorded after a mean follow-up of 1-36 months.
CONCLUSIONS
Working channel scopes using the SuPerLap technique avoid additional ports in inguinal hernia repair. They allow for excellent functional results, without visible scars, and minimize spermatic cord manipulation. Laparoscopy allows previously undiagnosed defects to be concomitantly treated.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.