Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2020
Detailed epitope mapping of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies against recombinant α-galactosidase A in patients with Fabry disease.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Scharnetzki David, Stappers Franciska, Lenders Malte, Brand Eva
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Fabry disease (FD) is a lysosomal storage disease, treatable by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) that substitutes deficient α-galactosidase A (AGAL). The formation of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (ADA) inhibiting AGAL activity is associated with disease progression in affected male patients. In the current study, we performed a detailed epitope mapping of ADAs from antibody-positive males against infused AGAL.
METHODS: A detailed epitope mapping for 34 male FD patients with neutralizing ADAs against AGAL was performed. Based on this data, in silico analyses were used to identify potential epitope clusters and mapped surface-located or buried epitopes. ELISA-based assays against α-galactosidase B (NAGA) were performed to identify ADAs that potentially recognize shared epitopes of AGAL and NAGA. A subset of 20 patients was analyzed to assess if NAGA-recognizing ADAs against AGAL might affect long-term outcomes under ERT.
RESULTS: Thirty percent of the AGAL active site was recognized by patients' ADAs. No differences between buried and surface-located epitopes were observed. Dependent on the epitopes, ADAs against AGAL were also able to recognize human NAGA. Patients with NAGA recognizing anti-AGAL antibodies presented with lower plasma NAGA activities. The presence of NAGA-recognizing ADAs had no effect on disease progression.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our current data underline previous reports demonstrating a large variation of antibody epitopes against AGAL. Detailed epitope mapping in affected patients might be the first step for the generation of patient-specific blocking peptides and/or immune adsorption columns for an individually tailored anti-antibody strategy.
METHODS: A detailed epitope mapping for 34 male FD patients with neutralizing ADAs against AGAL was performed. Based on this data, in silico analyses were used to identify potential epitope clusters and mapped surface-located or buried epitopes. ELISA-based assays against α-galactosidase B (NAGA) were performed to identify ADAs that potentially recognize shared epitopes of AGAL and NAGA. A subset of 20 patients was analyzed to assess if NAGA-recognizing ADAs against AGAL might affect long-term outcomes under ERT.
RESULTS: Thirty percent of the AGAL active site was recognized by patients' ADAs. No differences between buried and surface-located epitopes were observed. Dependent on the epitopes, ADAs against AGAL were also able to recognize human NAGA. Patients with NAGA recognizing anti-AGAL antibodies presented with lower plasma NAGA activities. The presence of NAGA-recognizing ADAs had no effect on disease progression.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our current data underline previous reports demonstrating a large variation of antibody epitopes against AGAL. Detailed epitope mapping in affected patients might be the first step for the generation of patient-specific blocking peptides and/or immune adsorption columns for an individually tailored anti-antibody strategy.