DOI 10.1016/j.clae.2019.12.006
Robust keratoconus detection with Bayesian network classifier for Placido-based corneal indices.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate in a sample of normal and keratoconic eyes a simple Bayesian network classifier for keratoconus identification that uses previously developed topographic indices, calculated directly from the digital analysis of the Placido ring images.
METHODS
A comparative study was performed on a total of 60 eyes from 60 patients (age 20-60 years) from the Department of keratoconus of INVISION Ophthalmology clinic (Almería, Spain). Patients were divided into two groups depending on their preliminary diagnosis based on the classical topographic criteria: a control group without topographic alteration (30 eyes) and a keratoconus group (30 eyes). The keratoconus group included all grades except grade IV with excessively distorted corneal topography. All cases were examined using the CSO topography system (CSO, Firenze, Italy), and primary corneal Placido-indices were computed, as described in literature. Finally, a classifier was built by fitting a conditional linear Gaussian Bayesian network to the data, using the 5- and 10-fold cross-validation. For comparison, the original data were perturbed with random white noise of different magnitude.
RESULTS
The naïve Bayes classifier showed perfect discrimination ability among normal and keratoconic corneas, with 100% of sensibility and specificity, even in the presence of a very significant noise.
CONCLUSIONS
The Bayesian network classifiers are highly accurate and proved a stable screening method to assist ophthalmologists with the detection of keratoconus, even in the presence of noise or incomplete data. This algorithm is easily implemented for any Placido topographic system.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.