Platelet transfusion in neonatal intensive care units of 22 European countries: a prospective observational study.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Houben Nina A M, Lopriore Enrico, Fijnvandraat Karin, Caram-Deelder Camila, Carrascosa Marta Aguar, Beuchée Alain, Brække Kristin, Cardona Francesco, Debeer Anne, Domingues Sara, Ghirardello Stefano, Grizelj Ruza, Hadžimuratović Emina, Heiring Christian, Krivec Jana Lozar, Malý Jan, Matasova Katarina, Moore Carmel Maria, Muehlbacher Tobias, Szabó Miklos, Szczapa Tomasz, Zaharie Gabriela, de Jager Justine, Reibel-Georgi Nora Johanna, New Helen V, Stanworth Simon J, Deschmann Emöke, Roehr Charles C, Dame Christof, le Cessie Saskia, van der Bom Johanna, Fustolo-Gunnink Suzanne, INSPIRE Study Group
Аннотация
METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study in 64 neonatal intensive care units across 22 European countries between September 2022 and August 2023. Outcome measures included observed transfusion prevalence rates (per country and overall, pooled using a random effects Poisson model), expected rates based on patient-mix (per country, estimated using logistic regression), cumulative incidence of receiving a transfusion by day 28 (with death and discharge considered as competing events), transfusion indications, volumes and infusion rates, platelet count triggers and increment, and adverse effects.
FINDINGS: We included 1143 preterm infants, of whom 71 (6.2%, [71/1143]) collectively received 217 transfusions. Overall observed prevalence rate was 0.3 platelet transfusion days per 100 admission days. By day 28, 8.3% (95% CI: 5.5-11.1) of infants received a transfusion. Most transfusions were indicated for threshold (74.2%, [161/217]). Pre-transfusion platelet counts were above 25 × 109/L in 33.1% [53/160] of these transfusions. There was significant variability in volume and duration.
INTERPRETATION: The restrictive threshold of 25 × 109/L is being integrated into clinical practice. Research is needed to explore existing variation and generate evidence for various aspects including optimal volumes and infusion rates.
FUNDING: Sanquin, EBA, and ESPR.