MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.040

Медицинская библиотека · Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2012

Prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial evaluating the usefulness of i-SCAN in screening colonoscopy.

Hong Sung Noh, Choe Won Hyeok, Lee Jung Hyun, Kim So-I, Kim Jeong Hwan, Lee Tae Yoon, Kim Jeong Han, Lee Sun-Young, Cheon Young Koog, Sung In Kyung, Park Hyung Seok, Shim Chan Sup

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The newly developed i-SCAN application can theoretically maximize the effectiveness of colonoscopy. However, the practical usefulness of the i-SCAN application during screening colonoscopy has not been assessed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of the i-SCAN application during screening colonoscopy.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized trial that used a modified, back-to-back colonoscopy.

SETTING

Academic hospital.

PATIENTS: This study involved 389 asymptomatic, consecutive, average-risk patients who underwent screening colonoscopy.

INTERVENTION: The patients were randomized to the first withdrawal with either conventional high-definition white light (HDWL group; n = 119), i-SCAN contrast/surface enhancement (CE/SE) mode (i-SCAN1 group; n = 115), or i-SCAN CE/SE/tone enhancement-colorectal mode (i-SCAN2 group; n = 118). All patients underwent a second examination with HDWL as the criterion standard.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measurement was the adenoma detection rate and adenoma miss rate. The secondary outcome measurement was the accuracy of the histologic prediction of neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps.

RESULTS

The adenoma detection rates during the first withdrawal of HDWL, i-SCAN1, and i-SCAN2 were 31.9%, 36.5%, and 33.1%, respectively (P = .742), and the adenoma miss rates of each group were 22.9%, 19.3%, and 15.9%, respectively (P = .513). Based on the multivariate analysis, the application of i-SCAN was not associated with an improvement in adenoma detection and the prevention of missed polyps. However, the prediction of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colorectal lesions was more precise in the i-SCAN2 group compared with the HDWL group (accuracy 79.3% vs 75.5%, P = .029; sensitivity 86.5% vs 72.6%, P = .020; and specificity 91.4% vs 80.6%, P = .040).

LIMITATIONS: Single-center trial.

CONCLUSION

i-SCAN during the screening colonoscopy may fail to improve adenoma detection and the prevention of missed polyps, but i-SCAN appears to be effective for real-time histologic prediction of polyps compared with conventional HDWL colonoscopy. (

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01417611.).

Для цитирования: Hong Sung Noh, Choe Won Hyeok, Lee Jung Hyun, Kim So-I, Kim Jeong Hwan, Lee Tae Yoon, Kim Jeong Han, Lee Sun-Young, Cheon Young Koog, Sung In Kyung, Park Hyung Seok, Shim Chan Sup. Prospective, randomized, back-to-back trial evaluating the usefulness of i-SCAN in screening colonoscopy.. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.040.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.