MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1120672119872367

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of ophthalmology · 2019

Comparison of clinical outcomes between manual and femtosecond laser techniques for intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation.

Monteiro Tiago, Alfonso José F, Franqueira Nuno, Faria-Correira Fernando, Ambrósio Renato, Madrid-Costa David

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose was to compare the visual, refractive and aberrometric results of intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation with manual dissection and femtosecond laser-assisted surgery.

METHODS

This is a multicentre study, which included consecutive patients with paracentral keratoconus, in which the difference between the axes of the topographic flattest and the coma aberration was <60°, who had Ferrara-type intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation using manual dissection or femtosecond laser technique. LogMAR uncorrected (uncorrected distance visual acuity) and corrected (corrected distance visual acuity) distance visual acuity, refractive errors and the root mean square for corneal coma-like aberration were recorded before and at 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The study included 84 and 110 eyes in the manual group and in the femtosecond group, respectively. After surgery, there was a statistically significant improvement in uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity for both groups (p < 0.0001), and there were no statistically significant differences between groups (p > 0.3). For both groups, there was a reduction in spherical equivalent after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation (p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in the magnitude of spherical equivalent reduction (p = 0.34) The magnitude of the root mean square coma-like reduction was 0.93 ± 0.76 and 0.83 ± 0.80 μm in the manual and femtosecond group, respectively (p = 0.2). While in the femtosecond laser group no complications were reported, in the manual group, the intraoperative or postoperative complications rate was 13.09%.

CONCLUSION

Although both surgical techniques provide comparable visual, refractive and aberrometric outcomes, it should be noted that the femtosecond laser is a safer surgical procedure, with no complications reported.

Для цитирования: Monteiro Tiago, Alfonso José F, Franqueira Nuno, Faria-Correira Fernando, Ambrósio Renato, Madrid-Costa David. Comparison of clinical outcomes between manual and femtosecond laser techniques for intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation.. European journal of ophthalmology. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1120672119872367.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.