MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ico.0000000000002128

Медицинская библиотека · Cornea · 2020

Clinical Results of Repeated Corneal Collagen Cross-linking in Progressive Keratoconus.

Akkaya Turhan Semra, Aydın Fahri Onur, Toker Ebru

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of repeated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in eyes with progressive keratoconus after primary CXL.

METHODS

Twelve eyes of 10 patients who underwent repeated CXL were included in this study. All cases were treated with a second CXL when disease progression was noted. Uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected distance visual acuity, and corneal tomography were performed before and after repeated CXL. Common risk factors for progression were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 23.4 ± 6.2 (14-34) years. Eye rubbing was detected in 6 patients. The preoperative maximum keratometry (Kmax) value was >58.0 diopters (D) in 11 eyes (62.2 ± 4.9 D). Repeated CXL was performed with a mean interval of 19.3 months after the first CXL procedure when a disease progression of 2.3 D on average in Kmax was determined. With a mean follow-up of 36 months, Kmax regressed in 8 eyes, remained stable in 2 eyes, and progressed in 2 eyes after repeated CXL. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity remained unchanged. No complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated CXL seems to be effective in stabilizing keratoconus progression after failure of primary CXL. Patients should be followed up at least for 2 years after primary CXL.

Для цитирования: Akkaya Turhan Semra, Aydın Fahri Onur, Toker Ebru. Clinical Results of Repeated Corneal Collagen Cross-linking in Progressive Keratoconus.. Cornea. 2020. DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000002128.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.