MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000227739.23850.4a

Медицинская библиотека · Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2006

The scalp is an advantageous donor site for thin-skin grafts: a report on 945 harvested samples.

Mimoun Maurice, Chaouat Marc, Picovski David, Serroussi Deborah, Smarrito Stéphane

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Thin-skin grafts taken from the thigh or buttock take a long time to heal and leave permanent scars.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective study based on their experience with 945 thin-skin grafts (0.2 mm) taken from the scalps of 757 adult patients between January of 1999 and December of 2003.

RESULTS

Of the 757 patients, 89 had grafts taken repeatedly from the scalp. The mean healing time was 6.2 days for a single harvest and 10.2 days for repeated (same hospitalization) harvests. During follow-up, eight patients had microalopecia and three developed "concrete scalp deformity." Of these 11 patients, eight had undergone repeated harvests. None of the other patients had any scarring; they were completely healed by day 15.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study confirm the rapidity of scalp healing compared with other donor sites. Providing patients with clear, detailed explanations helps minimize the psychological impact of having their heads shaved, and a rigorous technique can contain the two major potential risks: hemorrhage and alopecia. The adult scalp seems to be a donor site to be exploited whenever possible.

Для цитирования: Mimoun Maurice, Chaouat Marc, Picovski David, Serroussi Deborah, Smarrito Stéphane. The scalp is an advantageous donor site for thin-skin grafts: a report on 945 harvested samples.. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000227739.23850.4a.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.