Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025
Biomechanical superiority of novel dynamic tape over standard tape suture in distal triceps tendon repair: a human cadaveric study testing an intense early rehabilitation protocol.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kraus Moritz, Bocea Bogdan, Ion Nicolas, Dhillon Mehar, Zderic Ivan, Puls Luise, Gueorguiev Boyko, Richards R Geoff, Pape Hans-Christoph, Pastor Tatjana, Pastor Torsten
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Distal triceps tendon rupture is related to high complication rates with up to 25% failures. Elbow stiffness is another severe complication, as the traditional approach considers prolonged immobilization to ensure tendon healing. Recently, a dynamic tape was designed, implementing a silicone-infused core for braid shortening and preventing repair elongation during mobilization, thus maintaining constant tissue approximation. The aim of this study was to compare biomechanically the novel dynamic tape versus conventional tape in a human cadaveric distal triceps tendon repair model.
METHODS: Sixteen paired arms from eight donors were split to two groups. Distal triceps tendon tenotomies and repairs were performed via the crossed transosseous locking Krackow stitch technique for anatomic footprint repair. Either conventional (SutureTape) or the novel dynamic tape (DYNATape) were used. A postoperative protocol mimicking intense early rehabilitation was simulated by a 9-day, 300-cycle daily mobilization under 150 N load followed by a final destructive test.
RESULTS: Significant differences were identified between the groups regarding the displacement over time at the distal, intermediate, and proximal tendon aspects, p < 0.001. DYNATape demonstrated significantly less displacement compared to SutureTape (4.6 ± 1.2 mm versus 7.8 ± 2.1 mm) and higher load to failure (637 ± 113 N versus 341 ± 230 N), p ≤ 0.037. DYNATape retracted 0.95 ± 1.95 mm after each 24-hour period and withstood the whole cyclic loading sequence without failure. In contrast, SutureTape failed early in three specimens.
CONCLUSION: DYNATape demonstrated improved biomechanical competence compared to SutureTape in a distal triceps tendon repair model, with significantly lower maximal displacement and higher load to failure. These findings indicate that DYNATape may offer a more stable construct under controlled laboratory conditions. Knot slippage and bone-related complications observed in both groups underscore the technical challenges associated with this repair technique and highlight the importance of precise surgical execution.
METHODS: Sixteen paired arms from eight donors were split to two groups. Distal triceps tendon tenotomies and repairs were performed via the crossed transosseous locking Krackow stitch technique for anatomic footprint repair. Either conventional (SutureTape) or the novel dynamic tape (DYNATape) were used. A postoperative protocol mimicking intense early rehabilitation was simulated by a 9-day, 300-cycle daily mobilization under 150 N load followed by a final destructive test.
RESULTS: Significant differences were identified between the groups regarding the displacement over time at the distal, intermediate, and proximal tendon aspects, p < 0.001. DYNATape demonstrated significantly less displacement compared to SutureTape (4.6 ± 1.2 mm versus 7.8 ± 2.1 mm) and higher load to failure (637 ± 113 N versus 341 ± 230 N), p ≤ 0.037. DYNATape retracted 0.95 ± 1.95 mm after each 24-hour period and withstood the whole cyclic loading sequence without failure. In contrast, SutureTape failed early in three specimens.
CONCLUSION: DYNATape demonstrated improved biomechanical competence compared to SutureTape in a distal triceps tendon repair model, with significantly lower maximal displacement and higher load to failure. These findings indicate that DYNATape may offer a more stable construct under controlled laboratory conditions. Knot slippage and bone-related complications observed in both groups underscore the technical challenges associated with this repair technique and highlight the importance of precise surgical execution.