[Comparative study ofmethylene blue tracer and double tracer containing nuclide in sentinel lymph node biopsy of breast cancer].

Objective

To compare the application effect of blue dye single tracer and blue dye combined with nuclide double tracer in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) of breast cancer surgery.

Methods

A total of 92 breast cancer patients in Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute from November 2017 to October 2019 underwent methyleneblue dye combined with (99)Tc(m) sulfur colloid nuclide double tracer in SLNB, while other 92 cases in Jining First People Hospital underwent blue dye single tracer. The number of SLN detection, detection rate, accuracy rate, sensitivity, and false negative rate of the two groups were compared. The impacts of age, menstruation, tumor location, tumor size, clinical stage, pathological type, and estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal receptor 2 (HER-2), molecular typing, dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)on the detection rate of SLN were analyzed.

Results

The number of detection, detection rate, accuracy, sensitivity, and false negative rate of the blue dye single tracer group were 3.20±1.10, 90.22%, 93.48%, 95.24% and 4.76%, respectively; the double tracer group were 3.37±1.02, 92.39%, 95.65%, 95.65% and 4.35%, respectively, without significant difference (all P>0.05). In different age, menstrual condition, tumor location, clinical stage, pathological type, ER, PR, HER-2 expression and molecular typing, the detection rate of single tracer group and double tracer group had no significant difference (all P>0.05). However, in the tumor size of 2-5 cm and without DCE-MRI examination, the detection rate of single tracer group was significantly lower than that of double tracer group.

Conclusion

The effect of blue dye single tracer in detecting SLN of breast cancer is equivalent to that of double tracer method, which is worthy of promotion and application in primary hospitals.