Ileal Interposition for Ureteral Reconstruction Following Treatment for Abdominopelvic Malignancy: Complications and Outcomes From a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the outcomes of ileal interposition for the management of ureteral obstruction from tumor and ureteral stricture following treatment for abdominopelvic malignancy.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A retrospective database analysis was performed for all cases of ileal interposition performed by 5 surgeons from January 2013 to December 2020. Patients were ≥18 years of age and included if undergoing ileal interposition in either the primary setting of a surgical procedure for tumor extirpation or in the delayed setting.

RESULTS

In total, 23 patients who underwent repair of 27 ureteral units were included. The mean age was 60.2 years. Median follow-up was 21.6 months. The most common primary diagnoses were urothelial (35%), colorectal (31%), and cervical (22%) cancer. The etiologies of ureteral obstruction were malignant in 48% and ureteral stricture in 52%. Types of repairs included unilateral interposition in 13 patients, bilateral interposition in 1 patient, interposition to an ileal conduit in 3 patients, and interposition with cystoplasty in 6 patients. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean preoperative (Creatinine 1.05 mg/dL, Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate 77 ml/min/1.73 m2) renal function and postoperative (Creatinine 1.26 mg/dL, Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate 67 mL/min/1.73 m2) renal function at the most recent follow-up (P = .024). Eight minor (grade 1-2) and 6 major (grade ≥3) complications developed for a minor and major complication rate of 35% and 26%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ileal interposition is successfully utilized as a reconstructive technique at the time of enbloc resection involving the ureter and to address ureteral stricture in the delayed setting.