MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1354/vp.37-4-353

Медицинская библиотека · Veterinary pathology · 2000

A pleomorphic adenoma of the lacrimal gland in a dog.

Hirayama K, Kagawa Y, Tsuzuki K, Kotani T, Azuma Y, Yoshino T, Taniyama H

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A 13-year-old female mongrel dog had a pleomorphic adenoma of the lacrimal gland in the right upper orbit. The tumor measured 3.8 x 3.0 x 3.3 cm, appeared white, round, and firm, and pressed the right globe and surrounding tissues. Histopathologically, the tumor had a thin connective tissue capsule and was composed of tubules with two cell types, some resembling luminal epithelial cells making up the tubular structures and the other of myoepithelial cells. Epithelial tubules were disposed in an adenomatous fashion and separated from each other by proliferating pleomorphic myoepithelial cells. Immunohistochemically, large numbers of the luminal epithelial cells revealed an immunopositive reaction against keratin/cytokeratin (AE1/AE3), and some epithelial cells reacted against cytokeratin 14. Spindle-shaped myoepithelial cells revealed an immunopositive reaction against cytokeratin 14, alpha-smooth muscle actin, and vimentin. A small number of myoepithelial cells reacted against desmin. S-100 protein immunopositivity was frequently found in luminal epithelial cells and rarely in the pleomorphic myoepithelial cells. Glial fibrillary acidic protein positivity was commonly found in myoepithelial cells, myxoid matrices, and intracystic materials, but not in luminal epithelial cells.

Для цитирования: Hirayama K, Kagawa Y, Tsuzuki K, Kotani T, Azuma Y, Yoshino T, Taniyama H. A pleomorphic adenoma of the lacrimal gland in a dog.. Veterinary pathology. 2000. DOI: 10.1354/vp.37-4-353.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.