MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/asjof/ojag157

Медицинская библиотека · Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026

Construct Validity of the GENDER-Q Face and Neck Scales in 4890 Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults.

Klassen Anne F, Kaur Manraj N, Rae Charlene, Haley Caleb, Capitán-Cañadas Fermín, Simon Daniel, Capitán Luis, Berli Jens U, van de Grift Tim C, Mullender Margriet G, Satterwhite Thomas, Mundinger Gerhard S, Del Corral Gabriel A, Kaoutzanis Christodoulos, Hamidian Jahromi Alireza, Alperovich Michael, Liang Fan, Young-Afat Danny A, Cornacchi Sylvie D, Pusic Andrea L, Morrison Shane D

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Gender-affirming facial interventions aim to align facial features of people who identify as transgender or gender diverse (TGD) with their gender identity. GENDER-Q is a comprehensive patient-reported outcome measure with 11 scales that measure satisfaction with the face overall, facial features, specific facial areas, and laryngeal prominence (Adam's apple).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to examine construct validity for the face and neck scales in an international sample of people who identify as TGD.

METHODS

An international cross-sectional survey collected GENDER-Q data between February 2022 and March 2024. Participants were aged 18 years and older and had sought or received gender-affirming care within the past 5 years. Predefined hypotheses for expected group-level differences and correlations between GENDER-Q scales were tested using independent t-tests, analysis of variance, and Pearson correlation coefficients. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline was followed to establish construct validity (ie, ≥75% hypotheses confirmed).

RESULTS

A total of 4890 participants completed the GENDER-Q Face Overall scale and additional scales as relevant. The sample identified as man (33%), woman (37%), nonbinary (24%), and other gender (6%). The percentage of hypotheses that met the COSMIN criteria of evidence of construct validity ranged from 78% to 100% for the 11 scales. As hypothesized, participants who had undergone gender-affirming facial procedures reported significantly higher satisfaction with appearance scores than those who wanted surgery or required revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

GENDER-Q scales met COSMIN criteria for hypothesis-based construct validity. GENDER-Q can be used to inform clinical care and to advance research regarding gender-affirming facial interventions.

Для цитирования: Klassen Anne F, Kaur Manraj N, Rae Charlene, Haley Caleb, Capitán-Cañadas Fermín, Simon Daniel, Capitán Luis, Berli Jens U, van de Grift Tim C, Mullender Margriet G, Satterwhite Thomas, Mundinger Gerhard S, Del Corral Gabriel A, Kaoutzanis Christodoulos, Hamidian Jahromi Alireza, Alperovich Michael, Liang Fan, Young-Afat Danny A, Cornacchi Sylvie D, Pusic Andrea L, Morrison Shane D. Construct Validity of the GENDER-Q Face and Neck Scales in 4890 Transgender and Gender Diverse Adults.. Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum. 2026. DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojag157.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.