MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00007611-199903000-00008

Медицинская библиотека · Southern medical journal · 1999

Prostate cancer screening in primary care.

Carter F, Graham E, Pal N, Gonzalez E, Roetzheim R

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the actual frequency with which men have prostate screening in primary care settings, nor are the determinants of screening understood.

METHODS

We examined the records of 50 consecutive primary care office visits by men aged 50 or older. Men were asked to complete a brief questionnaire outlining their previous use of prostate screening services and the factors that influenced screening.

RESULTS

Screening in the previous year with digital rectal examination (DRE) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) was reported by 46% and 30% of respondents, respectively. Most respondents (86%) had heard of prostate screening and most (78%) believed it was effective. The only factor predictive of screening with DRE in multivariate analysis was a doctor's discussion of screening (odds ratio, 4.8). Two factors were predictive of PSA screening--knowing someone who had prostate cancer (odds ratio, 12.8) and advancing age (odds ratio [per year], 1.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Many men are not having annual prostate screening. Men who were older, who reported knowing someone with prostate cancer, and whose doctors discussed screening, were more likely to have been screened in the past year.

Для цитирования: Carter F, Graham E, Pal N, Gonzalez E, Roetzheim R. Prostate cancer screening in primary care.. Southern medical journal. 1999. DOI: 10.1097/00007611-199903000-00008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.