MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.040

Медицинская библиотека · Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2019

Quality of life instruments used in problem gambling studies: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Bonfils Nicolas A, Aubin Henri-Jean, Benyamina Amine, Limosin Frédéric, Luquiens Amandine

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the instruments used in original articles to measure quality of life (QOL) or health-related QOL (HRQOL) in gambling-disorder patients and to assess their suitability. The systematic literature search to identify QOL/HRQOL instruments used among gambling-disorder patients was performed in PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases up to November 2018. A meta-analysis was performed to study the effect size of the QOL/HRQOL instruments and gambling outcomes after an intervention. Thirty-five studies were included. Seven types of instruments aiming at measuring QOL/HRQOL were identified. These instruments explored twenty-six domains. The instruments used were not properly validated in the studies. Most of the clinical trials reported a significant difference in QOL/HRQOL between pre- and post-intervention. These results were concordant with gambling outcomes but had a smaller effect size than gambling outcomes. The currently used general instruments are efficient to measure a significant change after an intervention but might not evaluate specific areas of health related QOL impacted by gambling disorders.

Для цитирования: Bonfils Nicolas A, Aubin Henri-Jean, Benyamina Amine, Limosin Frédéric, Luquiens Amandine. Quality of life instruments used in problem gambling studies: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.040.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.