Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2004
Duodenal gastric metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori infection in high and low duodenal ulcer-prevalent areas in India.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tovey Frank I, Hobsley Michael, Kaushik Satyendra P, Pandey Rakesh, Kurian George, Singh Kartar, Sood Ajit, Jehangir Ernest
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Previous reports, based on surgery, showed duodenal ulcer (DU) to be more common in the rice-eating areas of southern India than in the northern wheat-eating areas.
AIMS: Does this difference persist? Can it be explained by risk factors other than diet?
METHODS: A total of 20 053 records from patients undergoing endoscopy for dyspepsia, and 590 endoscopy patients from two northern and two southern centers in India were studied prospectively. Records were scrutinized to determine the relative incidence of DU and non-ulcer dyspepsia in wheat- and rice-eating areas. Age, sex, length of history, smoking and medication were recorded. Three antral biopsies and one from each duodenal quadrant were taken. A rapid urease test was carried out on one of the antral biopsies; the others were examined for Helicobacter pylori, gastritis, duodenitis and duodenal gastric metaplasia.
RESULTS: The difference in diet-associated prevalence persisted. No differences in smoking, Helicobacter pylori infection or duodenal gastric metaplasia were found between the two regions, but all three were more common in DU than in non-ulcer dyspeptic patients from both dietary areas.
CONCLUSIONS: The dietary differences between the regions remain the only factor to account for the differences in DU prevalence. A strong interrelationship between duodenal gastric metaplasia and cigarette smoking is demonstrated.
AIMS: Does this difference persist? Can it be explained by risk factors other than diet?
METHODS: A total of 20 053 records from patients undergoing endoscopy for dyspepsia, and 590 endoscopy patients from two northern and two southern centers in India were studied prospectively. Records were scrutinized to determine the relative incidence of DU and non-ulcer dyspepsia in wheat- and rice-eating areas. Age, sex, length of history, smoking and medication were recorded. Three antral biopsies and one from each duodenal quadrant were taken. A rapid urease test was carried out on one of the antral biopsies; the others were examined for Helicobacter pylori, gastritis, duodenitis and duodenal gastric metaplasia.
RESULTS: The difference in diet-associated prevalence persisted. No differences in smoking, Helicobacter pylori infection or duodenal gastric metaplasia were found between the two regions, but all three were more common in DU than in non-ulcer dyspeptic patients from both dietary areas.
CONCLUSIONS: The dietary differences between the regions remain the only factor to account for the differences in DU prevalence. A strong interrelationship between duodenal gastric metaplasia and cigarette smoking is demonstrated.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceDietDuodenal UlcerDyspepsiaFemaleGastric MucosaGastroscopyHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansIncidenceIndiaMaleMetaplasiaMiddle AgedOryzaPrevalenceProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSex FactorsSmokingStatistics, NonparametricTriticum