MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000448

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ paediatrics open · 2019

Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants.

Kremer Lisa Jean, Reith David M, Medlicott Natalie, Broadbent Roland

Систематический обзорСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Routine retinopathy of prematurity eye examinations are an important part of neonatal care, and mydriatic medicines are essential in dilating the pupil for the eye examination. There are concerns about the level of evidence for efficacy and safety of these mydriatic medicines.

OBJECTIVE

This review evaluates both efficacy and safety evidence of mydriatics used during the retinopathy of prematurity eye examination.

METHOD: Systematic literature review.

RESULTS

There is limited evidence guiding clinical practice for safety and efficacy of mydriatics. The majority of publications are underpowered and with an unclear to high level of bias. There are a wide variety of mydriatic regimens evaluated for efficacy and safety, and multiple regimens are associated with case reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Current international guideline seems unnecessarily high, especially when the reviewed literature suggest that lower doses are effective, albiet from underpowered studies. The lowest effective combination regimen appears to be phenylephrine 1% and cyclopentolate 0.2% (1 drop). Microdrop administration of this regimen would further increase the safety profile, however, efficacy needs to be assessed.

Для цитирования: Kremer Lisa Jean, Reith David M, Medlicott Natalie, Broadbent Roland. Systematic review of mydriatics used for screening of retinopathy in premature infants.. BMJ paediatrics open. 2019. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000448.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.