DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.111008
Perceptions of primary and secondary care clinicians treating diabetic foot: A pan India study and quantitative analysis.
Аннотация
AIM: The study quantifies clinicians' perceptions and challenges during different stages of diabetic foot treatment. Diabetic neuropathy (DN), which is a major consequence of diabetes, significantly increases the risk of lower limb amputation. This can be prevented to a large extent by foot care, early detection, and lesion treatment.
METHODS
Ninety-two Indian clinicians of various demographics, medical specializations, and experiences were interviewed. Diabetic foot treatment by primary and secondary care clinicians was assessed. This study evaluates aspects related to patient awareness, compliance, and shortcomings of current diagnostic techniques.
RESULTS
A two-sample Mann-Whitney statistical method was used to infer the perceptions of clinicians on hypothesis questions. Primary and secondary care clinicians' perceptions differed for the hypotheses related to objective assessment (p-value = 0.001), operator variability (p-value = 0.03), and patient compliance (p-value = 0.047). Conversely, both groups held comparative perspectives for the awareness (p-value = 0.369) and examination time (p-value = 0.276) hypotheses.
CONCLUSIONS
All clinicians strongly supported the need for an objective assessment to reduce the misdiagnosis of DN. Further, DNis often underdiagnosed due to a lack of awareness and knowledgeamong people with diabetes. Secondary care clinicians acknowledged a need for trained operators to reduce reliability errors. These insights provide directions for future research in this field.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.