MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ccd.31338

Медицинская библиотека · Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2024

Association of Proximal Vessel Tortuosity with Technical Success and Clinical Outcomes: Analysis From the Progress-CTO Registry.

Strepkos Dimitrios, Rempakos Athanasios, Alexandrou Michaella, Mutlu Deniz, Carvalho Pedro E P, Bahbah Ali, Kostantinis Spyridon, Choi James W, Gorgulu Sevket, Jaffer Farouc A, Chandwaney Raj, Alaswad Khaldoon, Basir Mir B, Azzalini Lorenzo, Ozdemir Ramazan, Uluganyan Mahmut, Khatri Jaikirshan, Young Laura, Poommipanit Paul, Aygul Nazif, Davies Rhian, Krestyaninov Oleg, Khelimskii Dmitrii, Goktekin Omer, Tuner Hasim, Rafeh Nidal Abi, Elguindy Ahmed, Rangan Bavana V, Mastrodemos Olga C, Voudris Konstantinos, Al-Ogaili Ahmed, Burke M Nicholas, Sandoval Yader, Brilakis Emmanouil S

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Proximal vessel tortuosity can hinder wiring and equipment delivery during chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

AIMS: We sought to examine the association of proximal vessel tortuosity with the short and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing CTO PCI.

METHODS

We examined the association of proximal vessel tortuosity with clinical outcomes in patients who underwent CTO PCI at 50 US and non-US centers between 2012 and 2024.

RESULTS

Of 14,141 patients, 3,974 (28.1%) had moderate or severe proximal vessel tortuosity. Patients with moderate or severe proximal vessel tortuosity had more comorbidities and more complex angiographic characteristics, such as longer lesion length and higher prevalence of side branch at the proximal cap. Lesions with moderate or severe proximal tortuosity required greater procedure and fluoroscopy time. On unadjusted analyses, moderate/severe proximal vessel tortuosity was associated with lower technical success and higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). In multivariable analysis, moderate/severe proximal vessel tortuosity was associated with lower technical success (odds ratio [OR]: 0.77; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.67, 0.89) but similar MACE (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.73). Higher operator volume (≥ 30 CTO PCI cases per year) was associated with higher technical (85.2% vs. 75.6%, p < 0.001) and procedural success (83.6% vs. 74.5%, p < 0.001) but also higher risk of perforation (6.49% vs. 3.57%, p < 0.001) but not pericardiocentesis, in lesions with moderate/severe proximal vessel tortuosity.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate or severe proximal vessel tortuosity is independently associated with lower technical success in CTO PCI but not with MACE. High-volume operators are more likely to successfully perform CTO PCI in lesions with moderate/severe tortuosity at the cost of higher risk of perforation, without higher MACE.

Для цитирования: Strepkos Dimitrios, Rempakos Athanasios, Alexandrou Michaella, Mutlu Deniz, Carvalho Pedro E P, Bahbah Ali, Kostantinis Spyridon, Choi James W, Gorgulu Sevket, Jaffer Farouc A, Chandwaney Raj, Alaswad Khaldoon, Basir Mir B, Azzalini Lorenzo, Ozdemir Ramazan, Uluganyan Mahmut, Khatri Jaikirshan, Young Laura, Poommipanit Paul, Aygul Nazif, Davies Rhian, Krestyaninov Oleg, Khelimskii Dmitrii, Goktekin Omer, Tuner Hasim, Rafeh Nidal Abi, Elguindy Ahmed, Rangan Bavana V, Mastrodemos Olga C, Voudris Konstantinos, Al-Ogaili Ahmed, Burke M Nicholas, Sandoval Yader, Brilakis Emmanouil S. Association of Proximal Vessel Tortuosity with Technical Success and Clinical Outcomes: Analysis From the Progress-CTO Registry.. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31338.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.