MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00592-024-02320-2

Медицинская библиотека · Acta diabetologica · 2024

Effectiveness of different advanced wound dressings versus standard of care for the management of diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome.

Monami Matteo, Ragghianti Benedetta, Scatena Alessia, Miranda Cesare, Monge Luca, Uccioli Luigi, Stefanon Laura, Cappella Cristina, Silverii Antonio, Vermigli Cristiana, Panel of the Italian Guidelines for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome and on behalf of SID and AMD

СтатьяМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIM: to assess the effects of advanced wound dressings (AWD) commonly used in the treatment of predominantly neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) The present meta-analysis was designed to support the development of the Italian Guidelines for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome (DFS).

METHODS

A Medline and Embase search were performed up to April 1st, 2024 collecting all RCTs including diabetic patients or reporting subgroup analyses on diabetic patients with DFU comparing AWD with placebo/standard of care (SoC), with a duration of at least 12 weeks. Prespecified endpoints were: ulcer healing (principal), time-to-healing, frequency of dressings change, major and minor amputation, pain, and all-cause mortality. AWD assessed were: alginates; foam, hydrocolloids, hydrogels, hyaluronic acid, hemoglobin spray, silver-impregnated, sucrose octasulfate-impregnated, honey-impregnated, micro-organism-binding, and protease-modulating matrix dressings. Mantel-Haenzel Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (MH-OR, 95% CIs) were either calculated or extracted directly from the publications. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% CIs were calculated for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Participants treated with AWD had a significantly higher ulcer healing rate and shorter time-to-healing in comparison with SoC/placebo (MH-OR 1.50 [0.80, 2.79], p = 0.20 and WMD:: - 24.38 [- 42.90, - 5.86] days, p = 0.010). No other significant effect on the above reported prespecified endpoints were observed. For the primary endpoint, the quality of evidence was rated as "moderate".

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, AWD, particularly sucrose-octasulfate, hydrogels, hyaluronic acid, and honey dressings, can actively promote wound healing and shortening time-to-healing in patients with DFU.

Для цитирования: Monami Matteo, Ragghianti Benedetta, Scatena Alessia, Miranda Cesare, Monge Luca, Uccioli Luigi, Stefanon Laura, Cappella Cristina, Silverii Antonio, Vermigli Cristiana, Panel of the Italian Guidelines for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome and on behalf of SID and AMD. Effectiveness of different advanced wound dressings versus standard of care for the management of diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome.. Acta diabetologica. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s00592-024-02320-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.