MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1210/clinem/dgae128

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024

Improving Diabetic Wound-Healing Outcomes With Topical Growth Factor Therapies.

Wong Andrew Yew Wei, Hooi Natalie Ming Foong, Yeo Brian Sheng Yep, Sultana Rehena, Bee Yong Mong, Lee Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin, Tay Sook Muay

СтатьяСистематический обзорNetwork Meta-AnalysisПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

CONTEXT: Diabetes mellitus is associated with morbid complications such as diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) that may lead to amputations or mortality if not managed adequately.

OBJECTIVE

New adjunctive interventions to treat diabetic wounds include topical biologics and growth factors. This study aims to evaluate their efficacy in improving wound-healing outcomes and safety.

METHODS

Comprehensive database searches of MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were performed from inception to December 2022. Three independent researchers selected the studies. Randomized controlled trials that compared the use of a topical biologic growth factor-containing regimen to other biologics or standard of care (SOC) were included. This review followed PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias analysis was performed using the Jadad scale. Network meta-analysis was performed. Treatments were grouped into common nodes based on the type of biologic agent. Primary outcomes of interest were healing rate and time to wound closure. Secondary outcomes included wound infection, serious adverse events (AEs), and amputation rate.

RESULTS

Human umbilical cord (HUC) was associated with the highest cure, followed by recombinant human epidermal growth factor (hEGF). A significantly greater reduction in the time to cure DFUs was seen in HUC, hEGF, and fibroblast growth factor (FGF). There was a significantly lower risk of AEs when platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was administered.

CONCLUSION

HUC, hEGF, and FGF are promising topical biologics with statistically significant primary outcomes compared to SOC, while PRP is effective in reducing ulcer-related AEs. HUC has been found to be the most effective in terms of cure rate and a reduction in time to cure.

Для цитирования: Wong Andrew Yew Wei, Hooi Natalie Ming Foong, Yeo Brian Sheng Yep, Sultana Rehena, Bee Yong Mong, Lee Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin, Tay Sook Muay. Improving Diabetic Wound-Healing Outcomes With Topical Growth Factor Therapies.. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2024. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgae128.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.