MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.diabet.2024.101525

Медицинская библиотека · Diabetes & metabolism · 2024

BedBiopsy: Diagnostic performance of bedside ultrasound-guided bone biopsies for the management of diabetic foot infection.

Hassold Nolan, Bihan Hélène, Moumba Yolène Pambo, Poilane Isabelle, Méchaï Frédéric, Assad Nabil, Labbe-Gentils Véronique, Sal Meriem, Koutcha Omar Nouhou, Martin Antoine, Radu Dana, Martinod Emmanuel, Cordel Hugues, Vignier Nicolas, Tatulashvili Sopio, Berkane Narimane, Carbonnelle Etienne, Bouchaud Olivier, Cosson Emmanuel

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the feasibility and diagnostic performance of ultrasound-guided bone biopsies at the bedside of diabetic patients admitted for suspected foot osteitis not requiring surgery.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND

METHODS

In this retrospective monocentric study, we compared the performance of ultrasound-guided (n = 29 consecutive patients, Dec.2020-Oct.2022) versus surgical (n = 24 consecutive patients, Jan.2018-Nov.2020) bone biopsies at confirming or ruling out diabetic foot osteitis (primary outcome).

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were similar in the two intervention groups, including arteritis prevalence (62.3 %), SINBAD score, and wound location (phalanges 36 %, metatarsus 43 %, and calcaneus 21 %). However, the ultrasound-guided group was older (67 ± 11 versus 60 ± 13 years respectively, P = 0.047) and had more type 2 diabetes (97 % versus 75 %, P = 0.038). Diagnostic performance (i.e., capacity to confirm or rule out suspected osteitis) was similar for ultrasound-guided (28/29 cases: 25 confirmations, 3 invalidations) and surgical (24 confirmations/24) biopsies, P = 0.358. No biopsy-related side effect or complication was observed for either intervention, even for patients on antiaggregation and/or anticoagulation therapy. The mean (± standard deviation) time necessary to perform the biopsy was shorter in the ultrasound-guided group (2.6 ± 3.0 versus 7.2 ± 5.8 days, respectively, P < 0.001) and wound evolution at three months was more favorable (83.3 versus 41.2 %, P = 0.005) (94.4 % versus 66.7 %, respectively, patients with new surgical procedure within six months excluded; P = 0.055). Even though not statistically significant, healing rates in terms of wound and osteitis at six months were also better in the ultrasound-guided group (wound: 40.9 % versus 36.8 %; P = 0.790, and osteitis: 81.8 vs 55.6 % P = 0.071).

CONCLUSION

In diabetic patients with suspected foot osteitis not requiring surgery, bedside ultrasound-guided bone biopsies may constitute a promising alternative to surgical biopsies. This intervention provided excellent tolerance and microbiological documentation, short lead-times, and more favorable wound prognosis.

Для цитирования: Hassold Nolan, Bihan Hélène, Moumba Yolène Pambo, Poilane Isabelle, Méchaï Frédéric, Assad Nabil, Labbe-Gentils Véronique, Sal Meriem, Koutcha Omar Nouhou, Martin Antoine, Radu Dana, Martinod Emmanuel, Cordel Hugues, Vignier Nicolas, Tatulashvili Sopio, Berkane Narimane, Carbonnelle Etienne, Bouchaud Olivier, Cosson Emmanuel. BedBiopsy: Diagnostic performance of bedside ultrasound-guided bone biopsies for the management of diabetic foot infection.. Diabetes & metabolism. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2024.101525.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.