Techniques in coloproctology · 2014
Perineal stapled prolapse resection (PSPR) in elderly patients for external rectal prolapse: early experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ram E, Krissi H, Zbar A, Atar E, Joubran S, Rath-Wolfson L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Full-thickness rectal prolapse in frail elderly patients is often treated by a perineal approach with considerable attendant morbidity. We report our preliminary results of the perineal stapled prolapse resection (PSPR) technique for resection of full-thickness external rectal prolapse using a new reloadable Contour(®) Transtar™ stapler (Ethicon Endo-Surgery) device.
METHODS: Fourteen elderly high-risk patients with an external prolapse up to 10 cm in length were treated between April 2010 and October 2011, and operative factors, outcome and recurrence rates were assessed.
RESULTS: There were no intraoperative difficulties and no perioperative morbidity. The median operating time was 35 min (range 25-45 min) with a median hospital stay of 3 days (range 3-5 days). Four patients developed early recurrence over a median follow-up of 32 months (range 25-41 months).
CONCLUSIONS: PSPR is safer, faster and easier to perform than other conventional perineal prolapse procedures and is suitable for elderly, high-risk patients for whom an abdominal approach under general anesthesia is not advisable.
METHODS: Fourteen elderly high-risk patients with an external prolapse up to 10 cm in length were treated between April 2010 and October 2011, and operative factors, outcome and recurrence rates were assessed.
RESULTS: There were no intraoperative difficulties and no perioperative morbidity. The median operating time was 35 min (range 25-45 min) with a median hospital stay of 3 days (range 3-5 days). Four patients developed early recurrence over a median follow-up of 32 months (range 25-41 months).
CONCLUSIONS: PSPR is safer, faster and easier to perform than other conventional perineal prolapse procedures and is suitable for elderly, high-risk patients for whom an abdominal approach under general anesthesia is not advisable.