International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2019
Development and validation of a preclinical model for training and assessment of cerebrospinal fluid leak repair in endoscopic skull base surgery.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mattavelli Davide, Ferrari Marco, Rampinelli Vittorio, Schreiber Alberto, Buffoli Barbara, Deganello Alberto, Rodella Luigi F, Fontanella Marco M, Nicolai Piero, Doglietto Francesco
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Achieving an effective endoscopic skull base reconstruction in case of large dural defects requires specific training and can be extremely challenging. The aim of this study was to describe the development and validation of a preclinical model for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repair, which can be used for training and to test the mechanical efficacy of endoscopic skull base reconstruction.
METHODS: Eleven fresh-frozen cadaver heads were dissected. A catheter was inserted in the subdural space via a cervical access, which was sealed with mastic; a vertical graduated tube connected to the catheter measured intracranial pressure (ICP), while stained water was injected intracranially. After endoscopic skull base reconstruction was performed, an expert surgeon assessed its efficacy. ICP was then gradually increased until a leak was evident and CSF leak pressure value was recorded. The correlation between subjective and quantitative evaluations was investigated through Pearson and Spearman correlation tests.
RESULTS: The model was successfully tested in 11 specimens. A single, large dural defect was created in each model (transplanum-transtuberculum = 4; transplanum-transtuberculum-transsellar = 3; transclival = 3; transcribriform-transplanum = 1). Skull base reconstruction always comprised a rigid buttress with temporal fascia and/or fat. The CSF leak pressure ranged from 4 to 110 cmH2 O. The correlation between expert subjective and quantitative assessment of skull base reconstruction mechanical efficacy was high (r = 0.7; rs = 0.7; p = 0.010 and p = 0.006, respectively).
CONCLUSION: This preclinical model is simple, easily reproducible, and effective in simulating an intraoperative leak and objectively measures the CSF leak pressure point of a skull base reconstruction.
METHODS: Eleven fresh-frozen cadaver heads were dissected. A catheter was inserted in the subdural space via a cervical access, which was sealed with mastic; a vertical graduated tube connected to the catheter measured intracranial pressure (ICP), while stained water was injected intracranially. After endoscopic skull base reconstruction was performed, an expert surgeon assessed its efficacy. ICP was then gradually increased until a leak was evident and CSF leak pressure value was recorded. The correlation between subjective and quantitative evaluations was investigated through Pearson and Spearman correlation tests.
RESULTS: The model was successfully tested in 11 specimens. A single, large dural defect was created in each model (transplanum-transtuberculum = 4; transplanum-transtuberculum-transsellar = 3; transclival = 3; transcribriform-transplanum = 1). Skull base reconstruction always comprised a rigid buttress with temporal fascia and/or fat. The CSF leak pressure ranged from 4 to 110 cmH2 O. The correlation between expert subjective and quantitative assessment of skull base reconstruction mechanical efficacy was high (r = 0.7; rs = 0.7; p = 0.010 and p = 0.006, respectively).
CONCLUSION: This preclinical model is simple, easily reproducible, and effective in simulating an intraoperative leak and objectively measures the CSF leak pressure point of a skull base reconstruction.