MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1538574411427786

Медицинская библиотека · Vascular and endovascular surgery · 2011

Occlusion of the internal iliac artery prior EVAR: comparison of coils and plugs.

Libicher Martin, Pavlidis Daphne, Bangard Christopher, Gawenda Michael

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: We compared occlusion of the internal iliac artery (IIA) using coils or the Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP) II prior to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Occlusion of the IIA was performed in 32 patients (aged 74 ± 8 years) using coils (N = 17) or the AVP II (N = 15). We retrospectively compared procedural data, initial success, and clinical outcome in a 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Occlusion was successful in all patients without detection of an endoleak after 12 months. Procedure time and fluoroscopy time for coils versus plugs were 77 ± 35 versus 43 ± 13 minutes and 36 ± 19 versus 18 ± 8 minutes, respectively (P < .003). Incidence of initial buttock claudication (BC) for coils versus plugs was 47% versus 27% and was significantly more severe after coil occlusion (P = .03). After a 12-month follow-up, 2 patients of each group reported of mild BC.

CONCLUSION

Occlusion of the IIA is safe and effective using coils or plugs. Initial BC is significantly more severe when coils are used, but after a 12-month follow-up, there is no significant difference. Using a plug is associated with a significant reduction of procedure time and radiation exposure.

Для цитирования: Libicher Martin, Pavlidis Daphne, Bangard Christopher, Gawenda Michael. Occlusion of the internal iliac artery prior EVAR: comparison of coils and plugs.. Vascular and endovascular surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1177/1538574411427786.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.