MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10620-011-1982-6

Медицинская библиотека · Digestive diseases and sciences · 2011

Outcome of repeat ERCP after initial failed use of a needle knife for biliary access.

Donnellan F, Enns R, Kim E, Lam E, Amar J, Telford J, Byrne M F

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

A needle knife is often used to gain bile duct access when standard techniques have failed. If unsuccessful, the next step may involve either radiological- or endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary access. However, repeat endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) may be an option if the patient's clinical condition permits.

AIM: To determine the success of repeat ERCP after failed use of a needle knife to gain biliary access.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent initial unsuccessful biliary cannulation after use of a needle knife between 2007 and 2010.

RESULTS

Seventy five patients were identified. Of these, 51 (68%) underwent repeat ERCP, and biliary cannulation was successful in 38 (75%). The median time to repeat ERCP was 7.7 days (range 1-28 days). Complications developed in two (4%) patients. These included one case each of wire-guided perforation and mild pancreatitis, both of which were resolved by conservative management.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat ERCP within a few days after failed use of a needle knife for biliary access is associated with acceptable success and acceptable incidence of complications, and therefore obviates the need for alternative approaches for biliary access for most patients.

Для цитирования: Donnellan F, Enns R, Kim E, Lam E, Amar J, Telford J, Byrne M F. Outcome of repeat ERCP after initial failed use of a needle knife for biliary access.. Digestive diseases and sciences. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-011-1982-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.