MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41416-022-01912-5

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of cancer · 2022

Perioperative Adriamycin plus ifosfamide vs. gemcitabine plus docetaxel for high-risk soft tissue sarcomas: randomised, phase II/III study JCOG1306.

Tanaka Kazuhiro, Machida Ryunosuke, Kawai Akira, Nakayama Robert, Tsukushi Satoshi, Asanuma Kunihiro, Matsumoto Yoshihiro, Hiraga Hiroaki, Hiraoka Koji, Watanuki Munenori, Yonemoto Tsukasa, Abe Satoshi, Katagiri Hirohisa, Nishida Yoshihiro, Nagano Akihito, Suehara Yoshiyuki, Kawashima Hiroyuki, Kawano Masanori, Morii Takeshi, Hatano Hiroshi, Toguchida Junya, Okuma Tomotake, Takeyama Masanobu, Takenaka Satoshi, Akisue Toshihiro, Furuta Taisuke, Emori Makoto, Hiruma Toru, Outani Hidetatsu, Yamamoto Tetsuji, Kataoka Tomoko, Fukuda Haruhiko, Ozaki Toshifumi, Iwamoto Yukihide

Клиническое исследование II фазыСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This randomised phase II/III trial aimed to determine whether perioperative chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus docetaxel (GD) is non-inferior to the standard Adriamycin plus ifosfamide (AI) in terms of overall survival (OS) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

METHODS

Patients with localised high-risk STS in the extremities or trunk were randomised to receive AI or GD. The treatments were repeated for three preoperative and two postoperative courses. The primary endpoint was OS.

RESULTS

Among 143 enrolled patients who received AI (70 patients) compared to GD (73 patients), the estimated 3-year OS was 91.4% for AI and 79.2% for GD (hazard ratio 2.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.80-8.14, P = 0.78), exceeding the prespecified non-inferiority margin in the second interim analysis. The estimated 3-year progression-free survival was 79.1% for AI and 59.1% for GD. The most common Grade 3-4 adverse events in the preoperative period were neutropenia (88.4%), anaemia (49.3%), and febrile neutropenia (36.2%) for AI and neutropenia (79.5%) and febrile neutropenia (17.8%) for GD.

CONCLUSIONS

Although GD had relatively mild toxicity, the regimen-as administered in this study-should not be considered a standard treatment of perioperative chemotherapy for high-risk STS in the extremities and trunk.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCTs031180003.

Для цитирования: Tanaka Kazuhiro, Machida Ryunosuke, Kawai Akira, Nakayama Robert, Tsukushi Satoshi, Asanuma Kunihiro, Matsumoto Yoshihiro, Hiraga Hiroaki, Hiraoka Koji, Watanuki Munenori, Yonemoto Tsukasa, Abe Satoshi, Katagiri Hirohisa, Nishida Yoshihiro, Nagano Akihito, Suehara Yoshiyuki, Kawashima Hiroyuki, Kawano Masanori, Morii Takeshi, Hatano Hiroshi, Toguchida Junya, Okuma Tomotake, Takeyama Masanobu, Takenaka Satoshi, Akisue Toshihiro, Furuta Taisuke, Emori Makoto, Hiruma Toru, Outani Hidetatsu, Yamamoto Tetsuji, Kataoka Tomoko, Fukuda Haruhiko, Ozaki Toshifumi, Iwamoto Yukihide. Perioperative Adriamycin plus ifosfamide vs. gemcitabine plus docetaxel for high-risk soft tissue sarcomas: randomised, phase II/III study JCOG1306.. British journal of cancer. 2022. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01912-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.