MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10067-021-05734-3

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical rheumatology · 2021

Retention rate of a second line with a biologic DMARD after failure of a first-line therapy with abatacept, tocilizumab, or rituximab: results from the Italian GISEA registry.

Sebastiani Marco, Venerito Vincenzo, Bugatti Serena, Bazzani Chiara, Biggioggero Martina, Petricca Luca, Foti Rosario, Bortoluzzi Alessandra, Balduzzi Silvia, Visalli Elisa, Frediani Bruno, Manfredi Andreina, Gremese Elisa, Favalli Ennio, Iannone Florenzo, Ferraccioli Gianfranco, Lapadula Giovanni, Contributors

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

EULAR recommendations do not suggest which biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) should be preferred after failure of a first bDMARD in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In particular, few data are available regarding the effectiveness of a second-line bDMARD after failure of abatacept (ABA), tocilizumab (TCZ), and rituximab (RTX). The aim of this study was to analyze the retention rate of a second line with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or other mechanisms of action (MoAs), after the failure of either RTX, TCZ, or ABA.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-eight RA patients from the Italian GISEA registry were included in the study. RTX was the first bDMARD in 18% of patients, ABA in 45.7%, and TCZ in 36.3%, while the second bDMARD was a TNFi (group 1) in 129 patients and an agent with a different MoA (group 2) in 149.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 22 months (IQR 68), 129 patients discontinued their treatment; patients of group 1 discontinued the treatment more frequently than patients of group 2 (p<0.001) with retention rates of 33.6±5.7% and 63.6±4.6% after 104 weeks for group 1 and group 2, respectively (p<0.001). At multivariate analysis, the mechanism of action was the only predictor for the maintenance in therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our data, ABA, RTX, and TCZ seem to maintain a good retention rate also when used as a second-line therapy, suggesting their use after the failure of a non-TNFi as first-line therapy. However, specifically designed studies are needed to evaluate the more appropriate therapeutic strategies in RA, according to the first-line drug, including new targeted synthetic DMARDs. Key Points • A large proportion of rheumatoid arthritis patients fail the first biologic DMARD. • Few data are available about the efficacy of biologic DMARD after the failure of a non-TNF inhibitor. • Abatacept, rituximab, or tocilizumab seem to maintain a good retention rate after the failure of a first-course therapy with a non-TNF inhibitor.

Для цитирования: Sebastiani Marco, Venerito Vincenzo, Bugatti Serena, Bazzani Chiara, Biggioggero Martina, Petricca Luca, Foti Rosario, Bortoluzzi Alessandra, Balduzzi Silvia, Visalli Elisa, Frediani Bruno, Manfredi Andreina, Gremese Elisa, Favalli Ennio, Iannone Florenzo, Ferraccioli Gianfranco, Lapadula Giovanni, Contributors. Retention rate of a second line with a biologic DMARD after failure of a first-line therapy with abatacept, tocilizumab, or rituximab: results from the Italian GISEA registry.. Clinical rheumatology. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-021-05734-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.