MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.10.018

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of ophthalmology · 2024

Comparison of the Photoreceptor Mosaic Before and After Macular Hole Surgery With High-Resolution Adaptive Optics Imaging.

Oquendo Paola L, Wright Thomas, Naidu Sumana C, Cruz Pimentel Miguel, Hamli Hesham, Issa Mariam, Faleel Afira, Nagel Flavia, Yan Peng, Muni Rajeev H

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To assess the photoreceptor mosaic in patients with idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (MH) before and after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with adaptive optics enhanced retinal imaging (AO).

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of patients who presented at the Kensington Eye Institute, Toronto, Canada with a diagnosis of MH treated with PPV.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA: secondary MH, high myopia (axial length >26.5 mm), media opacity precluding optical coherence tomography or AO imaging, previous intraocular surgery except for cataract extraction. Imaging using an AO fundus camera (Imagine Eyes, RTX1) was performed preoperatively and 3 months following successful MH repair in both eyes. Cone density (CD), regularity, dispersion, and spacing were measured at 2° and/or 4° of eccentricity in 4 quadrants (superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal) with pre- and postoperative values compared.

RESULTS

We included 18 eyes of 9 patients. At 2° there was significant reduction in CD and increase in spacing and dispersion and a nonsignificant change in regularity postoperatively. Comparison between preoperative and postoperative measurements at 2° mean (standard error) were: CD: 14,612 ± 3003 and 12,280 ± 4632 photoreceptors/mm2 (95% CIs = -2413 to -702) P = .0004, regularity: 88% ± 7% and 84% ± 12% (95% CIs = -4.67 to 0.04) P = .054, dispersion: 19% ± 6% and 23% ± 10% (95% CIs = 0.5-4.24) P = .013, spacing: 9 ± 1 microns and 10 ± 2 microns (95% CIs = 0.40-1.27) P = .0002; at 4° was: CD: 13,377 ± 4339 and 12,770 ± 4391 photoreceptors/mm2 (95% CIs = -1368 to 252) P = .176, regularity:87% ± 9% and 86% ± 12% (95% CIs = -4.65 to 0.08) P = .74, dispersion: 20% ± 8% and 20% ±9% (95% CIs = -2.11 to 1.5) P = .74, spacing:10 ± 2 microns and 10 ± 3 microns (95% CIs = -0.23 to 0.58) P = .39.

CONCLUSIONS

AO imaging allows quantitative assessment of the photoreceptor mosaic pre- and post-PPV in patients with MH. There was a significant change to the photoreceptor mosaic related to the MH at 2° pre- and postoperatively. AO imaging enables high-resolution investigation of the photoreceptor remodeling process following surgery, which may allow for a more thorough assessment of surgical outcomes.

Для цитирования: Oquendo Paola L, Wright Thomas, Naidu Sumana C, Cruz Pimentel Miguel, Hamli Hesham, Issa Mariam, Faleel Afira, Nagel Flavia, Yan Peng, Muni Rajeev H. Comparison of the Photoreceptor Mosaic Before and After Macular Hole Surgery With High-Resolution Adaptive Optics Imaging.. American journal of ophthalmology. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.10.018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.