The International journal of prosthodontics · 2026
The Correlation Between Patients' Satisfaction and the Quality of Porcelain Fused to Metal and All Ceramic Restorations. Cross Sectional Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alraheam Islam Abd, Oweis Yara, Abuobead Doha, Ghrayeb Eduard, Yabes Hiba Abu, Aljamani Sanaa, Ismail Noor H
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Patient satisfaction with dental restorations is influenced by functional outcomes, aesthetics, comfort, and longevity. However, limited evidence compares the quality of PFM and all-ceramic restorations with patient satisfaction. This study examines the correlation between patients' satisfaction and the quality of PFM and all-ceramic restorations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A clinical examination was conducted on 100 patients using the modified USPHS evaluation criteria. Patients completed a questionnaire assessing sociodemographic factors, oral health habits, restoration characteristics, and overall satisfaction. Chi-square and Pearson correlation tests were used to analyze the data (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 62 had PFM restorations and 38 had zirconia/all-ceramic restorations. Satisfaction was reported by 84% of patients. Zirconia/all-ceramic restorations had significantly higher satisfaction (P = 0.02). Satisfaction correlated with anatomical form (P = 0.0001), marginal integrity (P = 0.0004), postoperative sensitivity (P = 0.0001), secondary caries (P = 0.03), and bleeding on probing (P = 0.0001). Bad odor was associated with poor marginal adaptation (P = 0.00), loss of restoration integrity (P = 0.017), and bleeding (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Zirconia/all-ceramic restorations led to higher satisfaction compared to PFM restorations made off base metal alloys. Factors like marginal fit, anatomical form, and oral hygiene significantly impacted satisfaction.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians should focus on providing high-quality restorations to improve patient satisfaction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A clinical examination was conducted on 100 patients using the modified USPHS evaluation criteria. Patients completed a questionnaire assessing sociodemographic factors, oral health habits, restoration characteristics, and overall satisfaction. Chi-square and Pearson correlation tests were used to analyze the data (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: Of the 100 patients, 62 had PFM restorations and 38 had zirconia/all-ceramic restorations. Satisfaction was reported by 84% of patients. Zirconia/all-ceramic restorations had significantly higher satisfaction (P = 0.02). Satisfaction correlated with anatomical form (P = 0.0001), marginal integrity (P = 0.0004), postoperative sensitivity (P = 0.0001), secondary caries (P = 0.03), and bleeding on probing (P = 0.0001). Bad odor was associated with poor marginal adaptation (P = 0.00), loss of restoration integrity (P = 0.017), and bleeding (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Zirconia/all-ceramic restorations led to higher satisfaction compared to PFM restorations made off base metal alloys. Factors like marginal fit, anatomical form, and oral hygiene significantly impacted satisfaction.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians should focus on providing high-quality restorations to improve patient satisfaction.