Bifascicular pacing: A novel multipoint left conduction system pacing method for cardiac resynchronization.

BACKGROUND

Pacing a single fascicle of the left bundle branch leads to a delay of the segments served by the contralateral fascicle. Bifascicular (BiF) pacing may offer better cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than left inferior fascicle (LIF) or left superior fascicle (LSF) pacing alone.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare synchrony between BiF and single-fascicle pacing and present the procedural, clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic outcomes in CRT candidates who received BiF pacing.

METHODS

The following parameters were investigated to assess acute differences in electrical and mechanical synchrony: paced QRS duration and QRS area, global R-wave peak time (RWPT) and dV/dt time in lateral leads (I, aVL, and V6), global longitudinal strain, peak strain dispersion (PSD), and global work efficiency. All measurements were performed during BiF, LIF, and LSF pacing.

RESULTS

28 CRT candidates (age 74.6 ± 12.2 years; 36% female; left ventricular ejection fraction 37.2% ± 10.6%) received BiF pacing. Compared with single-fascicle pacing, BiF pacing resulted in significantly shorter QRS duration, lower QRS area, shorter global RWPT, shorter global dV/dt time, higher global longitudinal strain and global work efficiency, and lower PSD; no differences were observed between LIF and LSF pacing with respect to these parameters. Lead I dV/dt time and lead I RWPT correlated with mechanical dyssynchrony, especially with PSD (r = 0.79 and r = 0.67).

CONCLUSION

BiF pacing is a novel physiological pacing method that more completely recruits the left conduction system. Compared with single-fascicle pacing, it improves electrical and mechanical synchrony, potentially translating to superior clinical outcomes.