MedElevator
Войти в исследования Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2010
Magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T for submandibular gland sparing radiotherapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Houweling Antonetta C, van den Berg Cornelis A T, Roesink Judith M, Terhaard Chris H J, Raaijmakers Cornelis P J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Besides sparing the parotid gland, sparing the submandibular gland is considered to be important in preventing xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients. Delineation of the submandibular gland at CT, and even on T(1)- and T(2)-weighted MR images, is difficult, due to low contrast with the surrounding tissues. MR sialography might be used for delineation.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixteen oropharyngeal cancer patients received a CT and MRI exam as part of the standard treatment imaging protocol. Patients were scanned in their five-point RT immobilization mask. The MRI exam included T(1)- and T(2)-weighted MRI scans and an MR sialography scan. Thirty submandibular glands were delineated on only CT, on the combined CT and T(1)- and T(2)-weighted MRI scans and on all MR images. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to test if the delineated volumes were significantly different.
RESULTS: The delineated volume of the submandibular gland was 7.3mL in the CT-delineation, 7.1mL in the CT/MRI-delineation and 8.1mL in the MRI-delineation. The MRI-delineation was significantly larger than the other delineations (p<0.001). The differences were mainly located in the cranial direction.
CONCLUSION: The delineation of the submandibular gland was improved in the cranial direction by using T(1)- and T(2)-weighted MRI and MR sialography, compared to the other delineations.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixteen oropharyngeal cancer patients received a CT and MRI exam as part of the standard treatment imaging protocol. Patients were scanned in their five-point RT immobilization mask. The MRI exam included T(1)- and T(2)-weighted MRI scans and an MR sialography scan. Thirty submandibular glands were delineated on only CT, on the combined CT and T(1)- and T(2)-weighted MRI scans and on all MR images. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to test if the delineated volumes were significantly different.
RESULTS: The delineated volume of the submandibular gland was 7.3mL in the CT-delineation, 7.1mL in the CT/MRI-delineation and 8.1mL in the MRI-delineation. The MRI-delineation was significantly larger than the other delineations (p<0.001). The differences were mainly located in the cranial direction.
CONCLUSION: The delineation of the submandibular gland was improved in the cranial direction by using T(1)- and T(2)-weighted MRI and MR sialography, compared to the other delineations.