m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Acta tropica · 2019

Comparison between systemic and intralesional meglumine antimoniate therapy in a primary health care unit.

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

de Oliveira Duque Maria Cristina, Quintão Silva José Jayme, Soares Priscilla Andrade Oliveira, Magalhães Rodrigo Sousa, Horta Adriene Paiva Araújo, Paes Lucia Regina Brahim, Rosandiski Lyra Marcelo, Pimentel Maria Inês Fernandes, de Fátima Antonio Liliane, de Camargo Ferreira E Vasconcellos Érica, Saheki Maurício Naoto, de Almeida Marzochi Mauro Celio, Valete-Rosalino Cláudia Maria, de Oliveira Schubach Armando

Аннотация

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is not a life-threatening condition. However, its treatment can cause serious adverse effects and may sometimes lead to death. Recently, safer local treatments have been included among therapies acceptable to New World CL cases, but the use of intralesional meglumine antimoniate (IL-MA) is recommended to be performed in reference centers, for patients with single cutaneous lesions <3 cm in diameter at any location except the head and periarticular regions; the volume of injected MA should not exceed 5 mL. In this study we compared two groups of patients with CL treated with MA in a primary health care unit in Brazil. Patients were treated with systemic MA (n = 76) or IL-MA (n = 30). In the IL-MA group, 93% of patients had one or more of the following lesion characteristics: two or more lesions, lesions >3 cm in diameter, lesions located in the head or in periarticular regions, or had been administered IL-MA volumes >5 mL. Patients responded well (68.4% and 66.7% for the MA and IL-MA groups, respectively). When a second cycle of treatment was necessary, the responses were 72.4% and 90%, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups. In the IL-MA group, 43% had mild to moderate adverse effects, without needing treatment discontinuation. Results suggest that the treatment of CL lesions with IL-MA is simple, efficient, and safe.

Предметные рубрики MeSH