[The rotational stability of Toric intraocular lenses and influencing factors in cataract patients with different axial length].

Objective

To evaluate the rotational stability of the Toric intraocular lens (TIOL) and influencing factors in cataract patients with different axial length.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study consecutively enrolled patients who had phacoemulsification and AcrySof TIOL implantation in Peking University Third Hospital from May 2018 to January 2019. Based on axial length, patients were divided into two groups. Group A consisted of patients whose axial length was ≤ 24 mm. Patients whose axial length was >24 mm were included in group B. Data at three months postoperatively were used to evaluate the rotational stability of TIOL and its correlation with axial length, corneal white to white distance, lens thickness and TIOL spherical power. And t test, nonparametric test, chi-square test and Spearman test were used for statistical analysis.

Results

Group A enrolled 39 patients (17 males and 22 females), with a median age of 74 years (range, 36-86 years). Group B enrolled 26 patients (11 males and 15 females), with a median age of 68 years (range, 36-86 years). For the efficacy of TIOL, in group A, the best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) was 0.30 (0.10, 1.00) preoperatively and 0.10 (0.00, 0.60) postoperatively, and the astigmatism was 2.11 (0.95, 5.10) D preoperatively and 1.00 (0.00, 1.75) D postoperatively. In group B, the BCDVA was 0.36 (0.05, 1.00) preoperatively and 0.05 (0.00, 0.40) postoperatively, and the astigmatism was 2.00 (0.78, 3.76) D preoperatively and 0.75 (0.00, 2.25) D postoperatively. Between group A and group B, there were no significant differences in BCDVA (P=0.604) and astigmatism (P=0.789) preoperatively.In these two groups, postoperative BCDVA and astigmatism both significantly improved compared to preoperative parameters (both P<0.01). Between group A and group B, there were no significant differences in BCDVA (P=0.536) and astigmatism (P=0.076) postoperatively. In terms of rotational stability, the rotation in group A was 5.15°±3.62°, and that in group B was 6.50°±4.66°. There was no statistical difference between two groups (P=0.195). As for predictability, the percentage of eyes with rotation ≤5° was 59.0% (23 eyes) in group A and 50.0% (13 eyes) in group B. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.647). There was no significant correlation between the rotational stability of TIOL and axial length, corneal white to white distance, lens thickness or TIOL spherical power (P=0.836, 0.568, 0.170, 0.365).

Conclusions

The rotational stability of TIOL at three months postoperatively in patients whose axial length >24 mm is of no difference with patients whose axial length ≤ 24 mm. It has no correlation with axial length, corneal white to white distance, lens thickness and TIOL spherical power. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2020, 56: 41-46).