Current vascular pharmacology · 2007
Closure of patent foramen ovale: when and how?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lisignoli Veronica, Lanzone Alberto M, Zavalloni Dennis, Pagnotta Paolo, Presbitero Patrizia
Аннотация
Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) was performed in 98 consecutive patients (mean age 52.5 +/- 13 years, 61 women). Indications included recurrent transient ischaemic attack (47%), cryptogenic stroke (34%), peripheral embolism (11%), disabling migraine with aura (4%), professional scuba diving (1 pt) and severe platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome (1 pt). Each PFO was characterized by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) according to anatomy, degree of shunt (1-mild, 2-moderate, 3-severe), right atrial anatomical features relevant for PFO closure (such as presence of an Eustachian valve, Chiari network, lipomatosis or absence of septum secundum) with a new classification scheme. According to this classification successful device delivery was obtained in 100% of pts. Major complications included heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in 1 pt and device dislodgment in 1 pt; minor complications were mostly related to the catheter introduction site (2 pts) and mild immediate shunt (2 pts). In conclusion, percutaneous PFO closure based on strict anatomic criteria is a safe procedure with minimal periprocedural complications.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Cardiac CatheterizationDecompression SicknessDivingDyspneaEchocardiography, TransesophagealEmbolismEquipment FailureFemaleForamen Ovale, PatentHumansHypoxiaIschemic Attack, TransientMaleMiddle AgedMigraine with AuraPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsProstheses and ImplantsRecurrenceStrokeSyndromeTreatment Outcome