MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001919

Медицинская библиотека · PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2012

Human african trypanosomiasis diagnosis in first-line health services of endemic countries, a systematic review.

Mitashi Patrick, Hasker Epco, Lejon Veerle, Kande Victor, Muyembe Jean-Jacques, Lutumba Pascal, Boelaert Marleen

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

While the incidence of Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) is decreasing, the control approach is shifting from active population screening by mobile teams to passive case detection in primary care centers. We conducted a systematic review of the literature between 1970 and 2011 to assess which diagnostic tools are most suitable for use in first-line health facilities in endemic countries. Our search retrieved 16 different screening and confirmation tests for HAT. The thermostable format of the Card Agglutination Test for Trypanosomiasis (CATT test) was the most appropriate screening test. Lateral flow antibody detection tests could become alternative screening tests in the near future. Confirmation of HAT diagnosis still depends on visualizing the parasite in direct microscopy. All other currently available confirmation tests are either technically too demanding and/or lack sensitivity and thus rather inappropriate for use at health center level. Novel applications of molecular tests may have potential for use at district hospital level.

Для цитирования: Mitashi Patrick, Hasker Epco, Lejon Veerle, Kande Victor, Muyembe Jean-Jacques, Lutumba Pascal, Boelaert Marleen. Human african trypanosomiasis diagnosis in first-line health services of endemic countries, a systematic review.. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2012. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001919.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.