Is the subischial socket better than others in subjects with transfemoral amputation? A systematic review of randomized and controlled clinical trials.

Rehabilitation is often complex for persons with transfemoral amputation, and poor socket fit is one of the main factors affecting gait re-education, rehabilitation, and quality of life. The present study systematically reviewed the literature to test whether the subischial socket provides better outcomes in comfort, quality of life, and mobility than other transfemoral sockets. Systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, Physical Therapy Evidence Database Scale, Epistemonikos, Cochrane, BIREME, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to January 2024 to identify randomized and controlled trials. Two authors independently screened records and assessed the risk of bias. We performed a narrative synthesis of the evidence and used the standardized mean difference and mean difference for meta-analyses and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach for recommendations. We identified 7 randomized and controlled clinical trials. Five studies compared the subischial socket with the ischial containment socket (IC), 1 study compared the IC with the Marlo anatomical socket, and 1 study compared the IC with the quadrilateral. Very low certainty showed a difference in comfort (1 study: mean difference = 1.4 [95% CI 0.61, 2.19]), but no in quality of life (2 studies: standardized mean difference = 1.28 (95% CI -1.04, 3.59), and mobility (2 studies: mean difference = 0.11 (95% CI -1.08, 1.29). We observed differences between the subischial socket and the IC in comfort but not in quality of life, mobility, and stability. Furthermore, we found a very low certainty that the subischial socket provides better outcomes than the IC in comfort, quality of life, and mobility.