MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.08.027

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2004

Analysis of nonlinear systems to estimate intraocular lens position after cataract surgery.

Findl Oliver, Struhal Walter, Dorffner Georg, Drexler Wolfgang

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of neural networks with that of linear regression to predict the postoperative effective lens position (ELP) from preoperative biometry measurements.

SETTING

Departments of Ophthalmology, Medical Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence, and Medical Physics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

METHODS

The neural-network-type multilayer perceptron (MLP) and a linear regression technique were used to predict ELP. Suitable MLP models and variable input combinations were selected by extended-feature subset selection. Apart from the usual preoperative biometric variables, anterior chamber depth and lens thickness were measured with partial coherence interferometry and white-to-white measurements were used as input variables.

RESULTS

Prediction of ELP could be improved from a correlation coefficient (Pearson) of 0.54 for linear regression to a coefficient of 0.68 for the MLP; however, this difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The prediction of postoperative ACD with the MLP was not significantly better than the prediction using linear regression.

Для цитирования: Findl Oliver, Struhal Walter, Dorffner Georg, Drexler Wolfgang. Analysis of nonlinear systems to estimate intraocular lens position after cataract surgery.. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.08.027.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.